  |
はてなキーワード:FACESとは
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
Please consider the histroy ofhumanity from biologicalperpsecitve and currentknown fact in nearbyuniverse, whichexpo-planet (from theSol systemperspective)ismostlikely to have civlizaedsociety? Pleaseaddpercentagenext toit in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanetcivilizationlikelihoodを28 秒行う
OK, I’mlookingatthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon an exoplanet within ourSolar System.I’ll consider biologicalhistory and current space knowledge,aiming to identifythe most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from ourSolar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard'sStar, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1,focusingon their habitablezonesand available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilizedsocietylikelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m notingkey exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which haveEarth-like characteristicsand are in habitablezones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advancedcivilizations.
I'm gathering infoonplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, consideringfactorslikemagneticfields,atmospheres, and proximity to G-typestars for their potential to support advancedcivilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despitebeing closeand around ared dwarfstar, might supportlife ifithas amagneticfieldand atmosphere. This makes me think aboutits potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimatingcivilization probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculativepercentagesbasedon the Drake equation and the lack ofevidence for intelligentlife.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names andcivilizationlikelihoodpercentages, grounded in the longtimeline oflife'sevolution, despite the speculativenature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering theirstar types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advancedcivilizations from oursolar system'sviewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due toits closeness and observational potential, despite concerns aboutitsflarestar dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'mfocusingon exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, andK2-18b,aiming to chart theirlikelihood of hosting a civilizedsocietybasedon current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilizedsociety, consideringEarth's long biologicalhistory.
Refining odds
I'm considering theastronomicaltimeline for intelligentlifeonEarth,leading me toassign evenlower speculative odds for exoplanetslike Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrarypercentages, clearly noting the speculativenature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience'sbasic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrarypercentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculativenature, and ensuring the datais accessible foryoung audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating amarkdowntable with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of civilizedlifeon exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoreticalnature and considering the understandinglevel of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mappingout amarkdown chart with speculativepercentages forthe likelihood of a civilizedsocietyon exoplanets, mindful of thecomplexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecingtogethermarkdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b'sreduced civilizedlife chance due to thered dwarf's activity. This inclusionhighlights the speculativenature of the analysis.
Piecingtogether speculative odds
I’m detailing amarkdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanetlikelihoods, considering environmental challengesand adding a disclaimer about the speculativenature and lack ofevidence.
Piecingtogether
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b forits proximity and silentstar, butI’lladd a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advancedcivilizations' hypotheticallikelihood.
Assessingcivilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligentlifeonEarth, which suggests that the odds ofany habitableplanet developing acomplexcivilization might beaslowas a fewpercent.
Belowis a very speculative chart that—basedon what we know aboutEarth’s long, windingpath fromsimplelife to a “civilizedsociety” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives somefun,made‑uppercentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists havenot yetfoundany proof oflife (let alone advancedcivilizations)onany exoplanet. Thesenumbers are just playful estimates to helpyou think about theideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an AdvancedCivilizationon Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet EstimatedLikelihood of a CivilizedSociety
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
HowDid We (Very Roughly) Guess TheseNumbers?
Earth’s Example:
OnEarth,life beganassimple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that builtcomplex societies. This longjourney suggests that—even if aplanetis in the “habitablezone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilizedsociety might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
Thisis the closest exoplanet to us. Even thoughitsstar (Proxima Centauri)is ared dwarf that sometimes sendsout strongflares (which might harmlife),its closeness makesitone of ourmost interesting candidates. That’swhy we giveit a slightly higher guess (~2%).
Theseplanets are part of agroup orbiting a verycoolstar. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaningone sidealwaysfaces thestar), so the chance of acomplex, advancedcivilization might be abitlower.
LHS 1140 b:
Thisplanetis promising in some ways butis alittle fartherawayand around a dimmerstar, so our playful estimateis evenlower.
All of thesepercentages are extremely rough guessesbasedon whatlittle we understand about the conditions forlife andintelligence. Scientists useideaslike the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concreteevidence, thesenumbers remain just forfun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring theseideas—and remember, spaceis full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equationitself and see if this euqationis acculate ormore opition in the equationyouwill use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation'svalue
OK, let me see. The Drake Equationisn't a precise formula;it'smore of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluatingits conceptualnature,its uncertain parameters, andits criticism to concludeonits reliabilityas an accurate predictivemodel.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mappingout the Drake Equationas a conceptual guide, detailingits parameters, which are oftenbasedon estimates or opinions, to evaluateits reliability for predicting extraterrestrialcivilizations.
The Drake Equationis a famous formula thatwas created to help scientists think about the manyfactors involved in estimating thenumber of detectable extraterrestrialcivilizations in ourgalaxy. However, when welookat the equation closely, we see thatitismore of a conceptualframework or heuristictool than a precise, predictive formula.Let’sbreak downwhy:
The equationis usually writtenas:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The averagerate ofstar formationper year in ourgalaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of thosestars that haveplanetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The averagenumber ofplanets that could potentially supportlifeperstar withplanets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of thoseplanets wherelife actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction ofplanets withlife where intelligentlife evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction ofcivilizations that develop technology that releases detectablesignals into space.
𝐿
L: The length oftime suchcivilizations release detectablesignals.
Why the Drake EquationIsMore of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction ofstars withplanets), have become better known through modernastronomy.
The parameters related to the development oflife andintelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—arebasedon very limited data. For example,Earthis theonlyplanet we know wherelifehas developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for thesefactors. This means that thevalues chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of PossibleValues:
Because many of thesefactors are not well-constrained, ifyouchangeone of themore uncertain parameters even slightly, thefinal estimate for
𝑁
N (thenumber ofcivilizations) can varyby many orders ofmagnitude. This wide range shows that the equation canlead to very differentoutcomesbasedonpersonal or theoreticalassumptions.
The Drake Equationwas never meant to provide a preciseanswer. Instead,it servesas a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrialcivilizations.It encourages discussion about the relative importance of differentfactors andhighlights where our scientific knowledgeis limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate orMore Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In thesense ofbeing a strict mathematicalmodel with well-defined inputs and predictableoutputs, the Drake Equationis not accurate.Its accuracyis limitedbythe extreme uncertainties in several ofitskey parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning theevolution oflife andintelligence, arebasedon opinion, interpretation, and the single example ofEarth. Therefore, while thestructure of the equationis logical, thenumbersyou put intoit (and hence thefinal result) are oftenmore reflective of our current opinionsand assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equationis a valuabletool for framing the question of extraterrestriallife.It helps scientists and enthusiastsbreak down acomplex problem into smaller,more manageable questions. However, because several ofitsfactors are highly uncertain and subject topersonal interpretation,itismore of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of thenumber of extraterrestrialcivilizations.
Insummary, while the Drake Equationis useful for thinking about the variousfactors that mightlead to the emergence of acivilization,itsoutputs should betakenas highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the longhistory ofSol system and nearbyplanets and see if thereisany possiblites that inonetime intelligentlife emerged in nearbyplanets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-humanintelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-humanintelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligentlife forms in theSol system and neighboringplanets, and how this mightfactor into the equation.
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligentlife, possiblyonMars orEuropa, into the Drake Equation for theSol system and neighboringplanets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligentlife emergingonMars orVenus, thoughEarth remains theonly knownlife-supportingplanet in thesolar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligentlife could have emergedonplanetslikeMars,Venus, orEuropa, and how thispossibility alignswith the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligentlifeonMars orVenus could intersectwith theassumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems tofocussolelyonEarth-basedevolution.
I’m piecingtogether the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligentlife in thesolar system.Mars,Venus, and Titan present challenges, butEuropa and Enceladus might harbor microbiallife.
これはHoYoFairの同人作品といってもおそらく準公式みたいなもんで、公式からディレクションがいくらか入ってるはず
サフェルは黒猫
ファイノンはたぶん青いたてがみの白馬2頭が曳くチャリオット、兵というより馬の方だろうか
ファイノンはバッドエンドのエンドロールで役名が？？になっていたのでこの絵面が彼の本質の暗喩になってる可能性がある
人外の中で黄色い目を持つ青黒いゴーレムは暗黒の潮により狂気に侵されたタイタンの尖兵と捉えていいだろう
地から天へと昇っていく不死鳥も黄金裔の一人だとすると、公開されてる8人のうち、一致しそうなものはヒアンシーくらいだろう
天へ昇っていく途中でおそらく「天空」のエーグルにロックオンされ、反応した尖兵に握りつぶされた
この流れはオンパロスPVのヒアンシーパートで白い鳥が矢に散らされるシーンとも一致するので多分そう
そうするとアナイクスだけが登場していないことになるが、疑わしいのは全体を通して傍観者ポジションにいる、黒いローブを被った灰色髪の少女か少年
螺旋の蛇あるいは絡む小枝のような意匠がローブに見られるのでケリュケイオンの印つながりで
この子がアナイクスに関連するのかもしれない、青っぽいグレーの髪色も一致している
また歌詞から、ローブ少年は不死鳥を希望として見いだしていて、送り出しているようにも見える
全体を通して映像の中心にあるのは浮遊する巨樹で「理性」のサーシスの象徴のように思え、アナイクスもサーシスの一派だと思われることと繋がりがある
最後のシーンでモーディスとトリノン？が墜落しつつ(死の予告？)も、サーシスを象徴してそうな巨樹が折れ、火種が落ちてきている
ここからこれは未来、サーシスが殞落する場面を描いていると受け取ることができる
ただ英雄たちがサーシスを殺したというより、尖兵ゴーレムっぽいのがサーシスを攻め、混乱の中こうなったように見える
となるとこの尖兵はどのタイタンの所属か、ということだが、先述したように「天空」のエーグルが筆頭候補だろう
Take a goodlook—thisis the LDP. Arottenship through and through. The hullis riddled with holes, the deckis stacked with decayed planks, and the crew talksbig about their voyage while steering aimlessly. Theydon’t even know where they’re headed—just waiting for the inevitablesinking. And what about the passengers? A chosen few lounge in luxury cabins, sippingonfine drinks, while therest shiveronthe exposed deck, batteredby wind andrain. Yet, noone dares to abandon theship.Why? Because there’s no other vessel in sight.
Those people, they claim, “We are the pillar that upholds thisnation.” But that pillaris infestedwith termites, reduced tonothing but ahollow shell. Theymask the stench of decay with flashy decorations and smooth words, and the public, gullibleas ever, eatsit up. This, too,is part of the sickness afflicting the country.
Defense, the economy, countermeasures for the declining birthrate—they shout these slogansat every turn, but thetruthis, they’reallempty promises.Everything they touch reeks of graft, cronyism, and self-enrichment. No matter how much the people suffer,it’s of noconcern to them. Every election, they trotoutcrowd-pleasing phrases, gather the votes, and voilà—the samefaces, the same farce,over and overagain.
But doesn’tit strikeyouas strange?Why do we keep boarding this doomedship?Whyis noone speaking up? Watching asinkingship and doingnothing but praying won’tchange a thing. If theshipisbroken, weneed to build a newone. If noone elsewilldo it, then we’ll have totake the helm ourselves.
LDP,yourtimeis up. No matter how manyrotten planksyou patchonto thisship,it’s destined tosink. That’s just the way of things.
----------
はてなの匿名ダイアリーの増田になった気分で，作文して．内容は，自民党を腐す感じ．ですます調は禁止．タイトルもつけて．
自民党という名の腐った船見てくれ、これが自民党だ。まるで腐った船。船体には穴が空き、甲板には腐った木材が積まれ、乗員たちは口先だけで航海を語る。どこに行くのかも知らず、ただ沈むのを待つだけ。乗客たちはどうだ？選ばれた少数は船室で酒を酌み交わし、残りは甲板で雨風に打たれている。それでも、みんなこの船から降りようとはしない。なぜなら他に船がないからだ。あの連中は言う。「我々こそがこの国を支える柱だ」と。しかしその柱は白蟻に喰われて、ただの見せかけになっている。腐敗臭を隠すために、華やかな装飾を加え、言葉巧みに煙に巻く。それを鵜呑みにする国民もまた、この国の病巣だ。防衛だ、経済だ、少子化対策だと喚くけれど、その実、中身は空っぽだ。何をやっても中抜き、天下り、自分たちの懐を肥やすだけ。どれだけ国民が苦しもうと、彼らは関係ない。選挙のたびに耳触りの良いフレーズを掲げ、票を掻き集める。そして、気がつけば同じ顔ぶれ。同じことの繰り返し。でもおかしいと思わないか？なぜこんな船にいつまでも乗り続けているのか。なぜ誰も声を上げないのか。沈みゆく船を見て、ただ祈るだけでは何も変わらない。船が壊れているなら、新しい船を造ればいい。誰もそれをしようとしないなら、俺たちがやるしかない。自民党よ、お前たちの時代は終わった。いくら腐った木材を継ぎ足そうと、この船は沈む。それが自然の摂理だ。
おｋ．これを英語にして
In a discussion about thecase,someone raised an objection to "someonewhowas not a party to the incident,whowas not from Nagasaki, andwhowas not fromHiroshima, complaining aboutit. Seeing that opinionmade me aware of my position, soI will say what I must say.
Iwas born in Nagasakiand am a third-generation A-bombsurvivor.
I say this because I grew up hearing the stories of the A-bombdamage directly from thosewho suffered from theatomicbombings.
Ifeel thatitis unacceptable forsomeonelike me to speak about the A-bombdamage.
However, there are few A-bombsurvivors left, soI will speak up.
In Nagasaki, children grow up hearing stories about theatomicbombing. We weremade tosit in the gymnasium of an elementary school in the middle ofsummer, where therewas not even anair conditioner or a fan, and for nearly an hour we weremade to listen to stories about theatomicbombing.Itwas hard for meanyway.
Ithink itwas evenmorepainful for the elderly peoplewho told the stories. But Idon't think an elementary schoolkid could have imagined that. I, too, have forgottenmost of the stories Iwas told. I canonly rememberone ortwoatmost.
Another thingis thatat thistime of year, pictures of the victims of theatomicbombing are pasted up in the hallways.
In other parts of the country, these are grotesque images that would cause a fuss from the parentswho arealways nagging about them.
Recently, even the A-bombmuseumhas becomemore gentle inits exhibits, andmost of the radical and horrifying exhibits that would have traumatized visitors have been removed.
Idon't know how elementary schoolsnow teach about the A-bombdamage. But when Iwas in elementary school, there werephotoson display.
Therewasonephoto that I just couldn't faceas an elementary school student.Itwas a picture of Taniguchi Sumiteru(谷口稜曄). Ifyou search forit,you can findit.Itis a shocking picture, but I wouldstilllikeyou to seeit.
I couldn't pass through the hallway where thephotowas displayed, so Ialways took the long way around toanother floor to avoid seeing thephoto.
My grandfatherwas under thebomb and went to the burntruins of thebomb tolook forhissister. I can understandnow that he couldn't turnaway orgoanother way.
There would have been a mountain of peoplestillalive and moaning in theruins of the burntruins. There would have beenmanymorewho would have diedout in agony.
My grandfather walked for miles and miles, towing a rear wheelchair, through the narrow streets of rubble-strewn Nagasaki in search ofhissister.
My grandfatherwas not a child then. But of course there were elementary school childrenwhodid the same thing hedid. Iam not speculating that there were. There were. I heard thestory fromhim, and Istill rememberit.
Ayoungbrother andsisterfound their father's corpse in theruins of thefire and burnedit themselves. Theydidn't have enough wood to burnhimalive, and when theysawhisbrain spillingout, they ranaway, and thatwas thelasttime they eversawhimagain.
I cannever forget thatstory I heard when Iwas akid, and evennowit'spainful andpainful, my hands are shaking and I'm crying.
I keep wondering how that oldmanwho ranaway fromhis father'sbrainwas able toexpose to the public the unimaginably horrible trauma, the scar thatwill never heal, even afterall these years.
Now I think I understand alittle.
Why I can't help buttalk about my grandfather and the oldmannow, evenas I remember my own trauma.
Because thislevel of sufferingisnothing compared to their wordsbeing forgotten.
It'snothing compared to the tremendous suffering thatonce existed thatwill be forgotten,like my hands shaking, myheart palpitating, mynose running with vertigo, and soon.
My grandfather,who went through an unimaginablehell,lived to seehis grandchildren born, and methissister'sdeath in theruins of thefire.
In other words, my grandfatherwasone of the happiest people in theruins of thefire.
My grandfather and that oldman were, afterall, just people wading in the depths ofhell.
I think that the suffering that even peoplewho had experienced unimaginablepain could not imaginewas lyinglikepebbleson the ground in Nagasaki 78 years ago, and noone paidanyattention toit.
Their suffering, which I can't even imagine,isnothing compared to the countless, unimaginable suffering they witnessed, which they pretend never happened.
Memories fade inexorably with each passinghuman mouth. Thememories that those people could neverallow to be forgotten are almost forgotten.
The tremendous suffering of 78 years agoismostlygone, never to be recounted.
Thosewho sufferedthe most from theatomicbombing died rotting in theruins of thefire withoutbeing able to tellanyone aboutit.
Many of thosewhosawitwith their owneyes kept their mouths shut and tookitwith them to their graves.Most of thosewho spoke a few words arestill in their graves.
Compared to the words of the old men, my own words are solight. I would rather keep my mouth shut than speak in suchlight words.
Butstill,someonehas totakeover. Irealize that even my words, which are solight, areonly thetop of the voices that are left in this world to carryon thestory of theatomicbombing.
I know howitfeels to think that Iam theonlyone.Still, Ihope thatyouwill not shutyour mouth.I know that I have closed my mouth because I thought I shouldn'ttalk aboutit, and thatis the result.
Sometimes I almost choose to stop imagining the unimaginable suffering andlivemy life consuming other people's suffering forfun.
Iam writing this while Istill have some imagination of the suffering of the old peoplewhose voices,faces, and even words I can no longer recall.
すまん。勝手に翻訳した。拡散はどうするかな。redditとかに投稿するのがいいのか?
----
I have seen some posts asking if they shouldtalk about "thecase" even though they were not involved init and were not born in Nagasaki orHiroshima, and Iam abit aware ofit, so I have to say what I have to say. I say this because Iwas born in Nagasaki,am a third generationatomicbombsurvivor, and grew up hearing the stories of thosewho experienced theatomicbombing firsthand.I knowit's alittlebit too much for me, but I'm going to say this because there are very fewsurvivors left.
In Nagasaki, children grow up hearing stories about theatomicbombing. They were stuffed into sushi for nearly an hour in the gymnasium of an elementary school in the middle ofsummer, with noair conditioner or fan, and told stories about theatomicbombing. Thatwas a hardtime for me. Ithink it must have been even harder for the old peoplewho told the stories, but therewas no way an elementary schoolkid could imagine such a thing, and I had forgottenmost of the stories I had been told for a longtime. I have forgottenmost of the stories Iwas told. I canonly rememberone ortwoatmost. Thereisonemore hard thing. Every year around thistime, a row of grotesque images that woulddrive thePTAcrazy in other areas are prominently displayed in the hallways. Thesedays, I hear that theatomicbombmuseumhas been bleachedout andmany of the radical and horrifying exhibits that traumatized visitors have beentaken down. Idon't know if they arestill there, but they were there when Iwas in elementary school.
Therewasonephoto that I just couldn't face when Iwas in elementary school.Itis a picture of Sumiteru Taniguchi. Ifyou search forit,you can findit.Itis a shocking picture, but I wouldlikeyou totake alookatit. I couldn't pass through the hallway where thephotowas posted, so Ialways took the long way around toanother floor of the schoolbuilding to avoid seeing thephoto.
Now I'm thinking that my grandfather,who headed into the burntruins tolook forhissister, couldn't have turnedaway ortaken a differentpath. There would have been a mountain of peoplestillalive and moaning, not just pictures,and a mountainmorewho would have given upat the end of their suffering. He walked for miles and miles, towinghis handcart through the narrow streets of rubble-strewn Nagasaki in search ofhissister. My grandfatherwas not a childatthe time, but of course there were childrenwhodid similar things. Not that there wouldn't have been. There were. I heard thestory fromhim, and Istill rememberit. Ayoungbrother andsisterfound their father'sbody in theruins of afire and they burnedit. Theydidn't have enough wood to burnhisbody, and when theysaw theraw brain that spilledout, they ranaway and thatwas thelasttime they eversawhimanymore.
I cannever forget thestory I heard when Iwas akid, and evennowitispainful andpainful, my hands are shaking and Iam crying. I keep wondering how the oldmanwho escaped from that father's brain could have been able to unravelthe most horrible trauma imaginable andexposeit to the public with scars thatwill never heal.
Now I think I can understand alittle.
The reason I can't help buttalk about my grandfather and that oldman, even if I have to rehash my own trauma,is that thislevel of sufferingisnothing compared tothe fact that their wordswill be forgotten. My hands shaking, myheart palpitating and dizzy, mynose runningwith tears,it'snothing compared to the tremendous suffering thatwasonce there andwill be forgotten.
My grandfather,who went through an unimaginablehell,lived to seehis grandchildren born, and methissister'sdeath in theruins of thefire. In other words, my grandfatherwasone of the happiest people in theruins of thefire. My grandfather and that oldman were, afterall, just people wading in the depths ofhell. I think that the suffering that even peoplewho had experienced unimaginablepain could not imaginewas lyinglikepebbles in Nagasaki 78 years ago, and noone paidanyattention toit. Their suffering, which I can't even imagine,isnothing compared to the countless, tremendous suffering they witnessed, which they pretend never happened.
Memories fade inexorably everytime peopletalk about them. Thememories that those people could notallow to be forgotten arenow largely forgotten; the tremendous suffering of 78 years agoismostly gone, never to be recountedagain. Thosewho sufferedthe most from theatomicbombing died rotting in theruins of thefire, unable to tellanyone aboutit.Many of thosewhosawitwith their owneyes kept their mouths shut and tookitwith them to their graves.Most of thosewho spoke a few words arenow under the grave.
Compared to the words of the old men, my own words are solight. I would rather keep my mouth shut than speak in suchlight words. Butstill,someonehas totakeover. Irealize that even my words, which are solight, areonly thetop of the voices that are left in this world to carryon thestory of theatomicbombing.I know howit feels to wonder ifsomeonelike myselfisallowed to speak about this.Still, Ihope thatyouwill not shutyour mouth. Thisis the result of our silence.
Sometimes I almost choose to stop imagining the unimaginable suffering andlivemy life consuming other people's suffering for thefun ofit. Iam writing this while Istill have some imagination of the suffering of the old peoplewhose voices,faces, and even words I can no longer recall.
Translator'snote:The original post inJapaneseis aresponse to a postby aJapanese contributorwho wondered if hewas qualified to speakouton the subject of the A-bomb when hewas not fromHiroshima and Nagasaki, butstill spokeout about Barbie and the A-bomb. I translatedithere because Ithink it deserves to be readbythe world.
I musttalk about various things regarding the Barbie incident.
Isaw a post aboutit fromsomeonewhois neither directly involvednor from Nagasaki orHiroshima, anditmade merealize that there are things I must say.
Iwas born in Nagasaki and grew up listening to stories from thesurvivors,being a third-generationsurvivor myself.Mostsurvivors are no longer with us, so Ifeel compelled to speak up.
In Nagasaki,kids grow up hearing about theatomicbomb. We were packedlike sushi in a gymnasium withoutair conditioning or even fans during the scorchingsummer, and we listened to stories about thebomb.Itwas incredibly tough for me.
I imagineitwas even harder for the elderlywho spoke about their experiences.As a child, I couldn't fully comprehend theirpain, andnow, I can hardly remembermost of the stories I heard. I canonly recallone ortwo.
Every year during thistime, gruesomeimages that wouldmakePTA elsewheregocrazy were displayed in the hallways. I heard that many of the horrifying exhibits that used to traumatize visitorsat theAtomicBombMuseum have been removed, andthe museumhas been considerably sanitized. I'm not sure about the current situation, but that's howitwas when Iwas there.
Therewasonephotograph that I could never bear tolookatas a child – a picture of Tadashi Taniguchi.You can findit ifyou search, butit's a shockingimage with a viewer discretionwarning.Still, I want people to seeit.
I couldn't walk down the hallway where thatphotowas displayed, and Ialways took a different route, avoidingit so I wouldn't have to seeit.
Now, I think of my grandpawho went to theruins to search for mysister. He couldn'tlookaway ortake a differentpath. Thepain must have been unimaginable.
Besidesphotographs, there were many living people moaning inpain back then, and there must have been evenmorewho succumbed to suffering.
My grandpa walked for miles, pulling a handcart through the debris-laden streets of Nagasaki, searching for mysister.
Even though my grandpawas not a child, I'm sure there were elementary schoolkidswhodid similar things. Idon't just think they might have been there; they were there. I heard the stories from the people themselves, and Istill remember them.
I can't forget the stories I heardas a child, suchas theyoung siblings finding their father's burnt corpse in theruins and crematinghim. Theydidn't have enough firewood, and their father ended uphalf-burnt. They ranaway after seeing the brain tissue oozingout, and that became theirfinal farewell.
I cannever forget those stories I heardas a child, and evennow, theystill bringpain and suffering, making my hands tremble andtearsflow.
I wonder how my grandpa,who ranaway from that father's brain tissue, couldexposehis unimaginable trauma and everlasting scars tothe world.
Now, Ifeellike I understand alittle.
Evensomeonelike me,who experienced such unimaginable trauma,hasgone throughpain that I can't even imaginebeing compared tobeing discarded, forgotten, and ignored. Compared to what those people experienced, my suffering meansnothing.
My trembling hands and the palpitations and dizziness I experienced arenothing compared to the tremendouspain that many others went through.
Memories fade irreversibly everytime they pass through people'slips. Thememories that I couldn't bear to be forgotten are almost forgottennow.
The unimaginablepain that existed 78 years agohasmostly disappeared, and we can no longer passiton.
The peoplewho sufferedthe most from theatomicbomb perished in theruins, rottingaway withoutbeing able to conveyit to anyone.
Even thosewhosawitwith their owneyesmostly took thememorieswith them to their graves.Most of them arenow under the tombstones.
Compared to the words of the elderly, my words seem solight. I think that speaking with suchlight words would be better than keeping silent,as silencehasled to this result.
Ifeellike I might occasionally choose to stop imagining the unimaginablepain and consume the suffering of others in an amusing way toliveon.
Before I forget thepain and suffering of those elderly people,whosefaces and voices I can no longer recall,I will leave thishere.
日本人女性の写真を生成するプロンプトについて私なりに試行錯誤した結果を示します。
画像は4つ以下に貼り付けました。
約2週間経過しているため、既に何らかの結論を得られているかもしれませんが、どなたかの参考にでもなれば幸いです。
actressを付けると安定すると書かれていましたが、正にその通りだと思います。
actressだけでなく、2つの言葉を重ねると表情や顔の作りが安定するように思います。
例として
actress×Japanese idol
AKB48 × a famousJapanesegirl inInstagram
などです。
今回のpromptで、日本人を示す言葉はこの部分くらいだったのですがそれなりに日本人ぽくなっていると思います。（ちなみにAKB48とnogizaka46で素人目に大きな差は出ませんでした。）
また結果(1)と(2)に含まれているAya Kodaのように適当に女性の名前を入れると結果が安定する傾向も見られました。
（私は適当に、北条政子、幸田文など、歴史上の女性名を使ってみましたが特にその名前の方々の特徴が取り入れられている訳ではなさそうです）
結果(3)は特定の名前を使わない代わりに、女性らしさが出るかと思ってmusculararm, cleavage of breasts, detailedなどを入れています。
CFGscaleは5～22で振ってみましたが、数値を大きくしすぎると光を強く当てたようなギラついた雰囲気になるようです。
（なお、自然光を当てた写真にするため、「on thebeach」としましたので室内の設定だと異なると思います）
STEPは100にしてもそれほど良い結果にならなかったため40～70にしています。
使用しているツールは、下記のstable-diffusion-webui（by Automatic1111）です。
https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui
なお本稿では以降stable-diffusion-webuiと記載します。
「Restorefaces」と「Highres,fix」はONにした状態とし、Samplerは「Euler a」を基本としています。
stable-diffusion-webui（Automatic1111）の機能については下記をご参照ください。
https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/wiki/Features
「Highres,fix」がその一助になると思いますのでもしお使いで無ければお試しください。
◆prompt:
Photo of a youngfemale wearing a T-shirt and jeans,Aya Koda, (((beautybright eyes))), cute face,Angel face, short hair, smallnose,on thebeach, ((perfect face)), detailed,photorealistic, cute slightsmile,Medium Shot, actress,Japanese idol,
◆Negative prompt:
ugly,fat, obese, chubby, (((deformed))), [blurry], bad anatomy, disfigured, poorly drawn face, mutation, mutated, (extra_limb), (ugly), (poorly drawn hands),messy drawing, penis,nose,eyes,lips, eyelashes,text, red_eyes, (((nipples))),(skinny), (((underbite))), long jaw, long hair,
Steps: 70,Sampler: Euler a, CFGscale: 6.5,Seed: 18523803, Face restoration: GFPGAN, Size: 576x768, Denoising strength: 0.4
◆prompt:
Photo of a youngfemale wearing a T-shirt and jeans,Aya Koda, (((beautybright eyes))), cute face,Angel face, short hair, smallnose,on thebeach, ((perfect face)), detailed,photorealistic, cute slightsmile,Medium Shot, actress,Japanese idol,
◆Negative prompt:
ugly,fat, obese, chubby, (((deformed))), [blurry], bad anatomy, disfigured, poorly drawn face, mutation, mutated, (extra_limb), (ugly), (poorly drawn hands),messy drawing, penis,nose,eyes,lips, eyelashes,text, red_eyes, (((nipples))),(skinny), (((underbite))), long jaw, long hair,
Steps: 50,Sampler: Euler a, CFGscale: 16,Seed: 1585211664, Face restoration: GFPGAN, Size: 576x768, Denoising strength: 0.4
◆prompt:
portrait of an attractive talent wearing a T-shirt and jeans, (((beautybright eyes))), cute face with elegant hairstyle, face to the left,on thebeach, ((perfect face)), musculararm, cleavage of breasts, detailed, intricate,photorealistic, a famousJapanesegirl inInstagram, cute slightsmile,Medium Shot,akb48,Japanese idol,
◆Negative prompt:
ugly,fat, obese, chubby, (((deformed))), [blurry], bad anatomy, disfigured, poorly drawn face, mutation, mutated, (extra_limb), (ugly), (poorly drawn hands),messy drawing, penis,nose,eyes,lips, eyelashes,text, red_eyes, (((nipples))),(skinny)
Steps: 55,Sampler: Euler a, CFGscale: 9,Seed: 3339383866, Face restoration: GFPGAN, Size: 576x768, Denoising strength: 0.25
※これはsamplerとCFGScale についての比較用です。
◆prompt:
Photo of a youngfemale wearing a T-shirt and jeans, (((beautybright eyes))), cute face,Angel face, short hair, smallnose,on thebeach, ((perfect face)), detailed,photorealistic, cute slightsmile,Medium Shot, actress,Japanese idol,
◆Negative prompt:
ugly,fat, obese, chubby, (((deformed))), [blurry], bad anatomy, disfigured, poorly drawn face, mutation, mutated, (extra_limb), (ugly), (poorly drawn hands),messy drawing, penis,nose,eyes,lips, eyelashes,text, red_eyes, (((nipples))),(skinny), (((underbite))),
Steps: 70,Sampler: Euler a, CFGscale: 5.0,Seed: 1729711779, Face restoration: GFPGAN, Size: 512x768
Negative promptは以下くらいに省略しても問題は無さそうです。
ugly,fat, obese, chubby, (((deformed))), bad anatomy, disfigured, poorly drawn face, mutation, mutated
ただしpromptもNegative promptは、あまりシンプルにし過ぎるとハズレ率が高くなるかもしれません。
またseedを固定してCFGScaleを変えた方が効果が出るケースも多いような気がしています。
結果(3)の「talent」の部分は、適当に職業名に変えても成立しました。
もう少し早く投稿したかったのですが、色々やっているうちにあっという間に時間が経ってしまいました。
また、日本人（というかモンゴロイド）に多い頬骨が張っていない丸顔を作るのは結構難しいと感じました。
以上
まどマギ…それほどどいつもこいつもまどマギまどマギ言ってた印象無い
あの絵柄だし、アニメ見る習慣ある人以外は見る人を選ぶ作品だと思うし(内容は言うに及ばず)
あの花やタイバニやおそ松…全く「社会現象」にはなってないと思う
「アニメ好き以外に訴求して数十年経っても語る輩が居る作品」が社会現象と言うにふさわしいと思う
ついでに言えば「10年単位で燃料(新作)投入されるから話題長持ち」ってのも社会現象アニメの特徴かな
KalafinaのMagiaは名曲だけど、世間の人間が知ってるか?っていうと知らないと思う
オリオンをなぞるもSIX SAMEFACESも良いけど以下同文
「ざーんこーくなてんしのよおにーしょーおーねーんよしんわになーれー」なんて、世界で一番歌われた曲じゃねーかってくらい知名度高いよね
まあ、曲自体が良くてキャッチーだったから「作品見てないけど曲知ってる」って人も多かったかもしれないが
そんな作品て他にあるかねえ。エヴァ以前なら松本零士系が「アニメファン以外への訴求力に富んでいた」イメージだ
「ガンダム」という作品名を知らない80代未満の日本人てそんなに居ないだろうけど、見たかどうかってなるとなあ?
エヴァ以後ってなると…余計思いつかん
というか、分かりやすく「エヴァ芸人」は居ても「タイバニ芸人」「おそ松芸人」は居ないと思う(人数が集まらない)
…「まどマギ芸人」は結構集まるだろうけど…アメトーク成立するかなあ?
senbuu氏の右往左往はともかく、ゲキサカの誤訳は事実なので、書き残しておきたい。
スタッフがテレビの設定などを行う中、デンベレが「こんな醜い顔を並べて、恥ずかしくないのか」「どんな後進国の言葉なんだ」「お前の国は技術的に進んでいるのか、いないのか」などと発言したという。
しかし当初の記事は、デンベレの発言をこのように紹介していた。
スタッフがテレビの設定などを行う中、デンベレが「こんな醜い顔をして恥ずかしくないのか」「どんな後進国の言葉なんだ」「お前の国は技術的に進んでいるのか、いないのか」などと発言したという。
https://archive.md/20210703222708/https://web.gekisaka.jp/news/detail/?335703-335703-fl
「恥ずかしくないのか」は同僚に向けられた言葉であることは、YouTubeの仏人によっても指摘されている。
デンベレは、日本人の顔について「恥ずかしくないのか」と言った訳ではない。
修正後の「醜い顔を並べて」もだいぶ意味不明なのだが、分からない程度に修正したということだろうか。
辻氏が槍玉にあげたデイリーメールですら、「All these uglyfaces, just soyou can playPES, aren'tyou ashamed?(この醜い顔、たかがお前がPESをプレイするだけのためなんだぞ。お前恥ずかしくないのか？)」としていて、日本人に向けて「醜い顔して恥ずかしくないのか？」と言ったのではない。
前者と後者ではだいぶ印象が違う。訂正前の誤訳を見て噴き上がった人も多かったのではないか。
「なんて醜い顔なんだ。恥ずかしくないのか？」
としている。
https://www.iza.ne.jp/article/20210706-Q5QL54SNQBHVLMC77MIP4BBWZA/
人種差別的発言に怒るのは分かるが、これだけ誤訳が出回ったまま放置は信じ難い。
経緯としては、デイリーメールによって、2019年にバルサが来日した際に以下の様な動画が撮影され、その内容が問題であることを報じられた事に始まった問題だけど
デンベレ選手やグリーズマン選手らを処罰して個人の意識の問題にすることに違和感を感じている、と言う話。
個人的には、両選手が日本人を特別に嘲笑って差別しているという風には感じなかったけど、問題の根はもっと深くてエグイなとも感じた。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgZJC6QAZgA
フランス語の以下の英訳が差別的な発言であるという印象を強めている。
スラング入りなので意訳してみると
「この連中は何だ？お前がPESを遊べるようにするためにいるのか？そんなことの為に、こんな連中呼んではずかしくねぇのかよ？」、この連中を直訳して醜い顔の連中と置き換えるとセンセーションではある。
「は？何言ってんだか分からねぇよ」、どんな遅れた言葉だよ、って直訳するとヤバさは際立ちますね。
「お前らはこの国じゃ技術のある人間じゃないのかよ？」、これは直訳も糞もなく字義通りでしょう。
俺の最初の印象としては、「なんだ？このガキは。癇癪起こしてんじゃねぇよ」って感じだったけど、世論は一気に吹き上がった感があって不思議ではあった。
辻氏だけではなく複数のフランス語話者が、意図的な誤訳が含まれるという点を指摘しているけれど、俺は英語は使えてもフランス語は全く分からんので真偽の判定は難しい。DeelL翻訳で英語にしてみる。
フランス語の抜出を辻氏が嘘をついてる可能性も考えないではないが、公開されている映像で、辻仁成ほど名の知れた人がそれをやる意味が見いだせないので内容は信じたい。
Toutesces sales gueules pour jouerunPESbordel!Ils n’ontpas honte?
All these uglyfaces to play aPES damn!Don't they haveanyshame?
「この醜い連中はPESを遊ぶ為にいる、恥ずかしくないのか？」醜い顔が恥ずかしいと言ってる様な文脈にはとても思えない。
https://www.designstoriesinc.com/jinsei/daily-1980/
これは日本で起こったことですが、世界のどこで起こってもおかしくないことであり、場所に関係なく同じ言葉を使っていたと思います。特定のコミュニティに向けたものではありません
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/b2ec34c371d23a3bc97547d6028d4d728f48906e
と言っているけれど、俺はこの発言は言い逃れやいい訳ではなくて、本当にそうなのだろうと思った。
理由は、経緯をおいつつ発言の内容を英語で理解しようとした時に、デンベレ選手は「作業がスムーズに進まないで、要求が満たされない事にキレ散らかしてる」としか思えなかったからだ。
あの場面で、作業をしている人にフランス語話者がいれば酷い罵倒に取られる訳で、いかに職業意識が高い日本人でも、要求にスマートに答えられない申し訳なさよりも怒りが勝つかもしれない。
それくらいリスペクトに欠けた言葉遣いだったことは疑いないけど、差別のつもりではなかったってのは、そうなのだろうと理解はした。
今分かる事は、日本人に対して差別の意識があるかどうかはともかくとして、デンベレ選手自身は、汚いスラングを使って日常的に会話する人であるという事だろう。
サッカー選手はジネディーヌ・ジダン氏からして、デンベレ選手同様に移民の子であり、犯罪率も高いスラムの様な場所で育ちサッカー選手としての才能と努力でのし上がって来た成功者が多い。
ブラジル人だと、毎日誰かが殺されるようなスラムから抜け出す事が出来て嬉しい、と言うようなことを来日した選手がいっていることはよくある。そして、彼らは家族や仲間への愛情がひときわ強い。
欧州に今もなお健在の階級の壁を才能によって超えたとはいっても、彼らの育ったバックグラウンドが消える訳じゃない。地元に戻って友達と話せば、上品な言葉ではなく、スラング交じりのカッコつけた言葉で話するだろう。
日本でも、ほとんど耳にすることもないけれど、ヤンキーが、サツカンとか、ポリとか警察を呼ぶような俗語があった。今も不良少年の間で、俗語が使われてるかは知らんけど、世界中のどこにでもあるだろう。
日本の不良少年は大人になり社会に出るとそういう俗語は捨てる（だけの教養は自然と備わる）が、同じような立場の選手も多いサッカー選手同士だと、そんな話し方が常態化してるのかもしれない。
フランスの中で放置され、隔絶され、隠されてる貧困層の文化を持った青年が、選手として成功する事で、地元の仲間内では普通の文化を表社会に見せてしまう事があるという事なんだろう。
フランス人も含めて世界中で、これは差別だと一斉に叩いているけれど、欧米人お得意のポリコレこん棒の過剰な振り回しの側面は否めないと思う。
同時に、フランスの恥部に向き合う事なく、選手個人の問題にして切り離そうとしてるのが更に酷い問題に思えた。
社会に存在する階級の差を放置したまま、ポリコレこん棒で叩いて表立った問題は起こさない様にしたところで、本当の差別は消えないだろう。
貧しいものは、自分たちの仕事を奪う移民を嫌うのは、昨今の欧米の時事を追えば誰にでもわかることだ。そこから差別が生まれ続ける。
デンベレ選手の問題を個人の恥ずべき行動だと切り離して、階級の差から目を背けている間は、フランスの社会が差別をなくすことなんて200％出来ないなと強く思う。
スラングが表に出てくるのが嫌なら、階級の差をなくして、移民差別黒人差別も無くして、きちんと教育して社会に送り出せ。これは、ただのフランスの恥でしかないし、日本人が付き合って怒ってやるのも馬鹿らしい話だ。
https://twitter.com/DabadieTV/status/1412191937495388160
フローラン・ダバディ氏が、本質的なところでは同意見だということで、ほらなと言う感じだ。
フランスが目を背けて逃げてる移民・黒人との階級の差が、成功によって日の目を見てるだけなのだ。十分な教育が行き届いてない事実が見えるだけだ。
ちなみに仏ハフポストは読んでみた？
ハフポストですら、「こんな醜い顔をして恥ずかしくないのか」のような愚かな誤訳はしていないんだが。ただ、表現が断片的でよく分からない。
そして確かにデイリーメールも、「All these uglyfaces, just soyou can playPES, aren'tyou ashamed?」とやはり醜い顔＝恥、という誤訳の元を作り出してるが、
それでも「PESをプレイできるようにするために」という決定的な一文が入っている。
醜いってのは、アジア人特有の風貌を言ってるんじゃないんだよ。
必死こいてる姿を嘲笑してるだけだ。そこに人種差別があったかは、本人にしか分からんだろ？
まあ最大の誤訳は、その一文、『just soyou can playPES(たかだかPESをプレイするだけのために)』をゲキサカが抜いて「こんな醜い顔をして恥ずかしくないのか」と一直線に繋げた点だろうな。
いずれにしても、「Toutesces sales gueules pour jouerunPESbordel!」と「Ilsne sontpas hontes?」を繋げて「こんな醜い顔をして恥ずかしくないのか」とするのは、誤訳以外の何物でもない。
こうして比較してみると、"radioactive water" はどちらかと言えば強い方の表現だなと思った。
contaminatedFukushima water, contaminated water
Japan saysitwill releasemore thanone million tonnes of contaminated water from the ruinedFukushima nuclearpower station back into thesea, in a decision that drewswift condemnation fromChina, SouthKorea and environmental groups andis likely to anger thefishing industry.
ttps://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/4/13/japan-to-release-contaminated-fukushima-water-into-sea
Fukushima radioactive water, contaminated water
Japan to announceFukushima radioactive water release intosea
Tokyo appearsset to formally announceitsfinal decisionon the release of contaminated water fromits wreckedFukushima nuclearpowerplant into thesea.
ttp://www.arirang.com/News/News_View.asp?nSeq=275277
wastewater, contaminated water
Japanhas approved a plan to releasemore thanone million tonnes of contaminated water from the destroyedFukushima nuclearplant into thesea.
ttps://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-56728068
treatedFukushima water, contaminated water
Japan to release treatedFukushima water into thesea:PM Yoshihide Suga
TheJapanese government plans to releasemore than 1 million tonnes of contaminated water from the destroyedFukushima nuclearplant intothe ocean,Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga saidon Tuesday (Apr 13), in a controversial decision that follows years of debate.
ttps://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/japan-fukushima-nuclear-plant-water-sea-yoshihide-suga-14610968
Fukushima wastewater, radioactive water
Japan determined to releaseFukushima wastewater despite backlash
JapanesePrime Minister Yoshihide Suga saidonMonday that the disposal of radioactive water from the crippledFukushima nuclearpowerplant cannot bepostponed amid plans to rebuild theplant, despite the looming backlash from bothhomeand abroad,broadcasterNHK reported.
ttps://news.cgtn.com/news/2021-04-12/The-plan-to-release-Fukushima-wastewater-sparks-backlash-ZoFTbhBjG0/index.html
treatedFukushima water, treated radioactive water
Japan to start releasing treatedFukushima water intosea in 2 years
Japanwill start releasingmore than 1 million metric tons of treated radioactive water fromits destroyedFukushima nuclearplant intothe ocean intwo years, the government said Tuesday -- a plan thatfaces oppositionathome andhas raised "graveconcern" in neighboring countries.
ttps://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/12/asia/japan-fukushima-water-intl-hnk/index.html
radioactive water
Fukushima: SouthKorea summonsJapan'senvoyoverdumping decision
TheJapanese governmenthas approved a controversial plan to release radioactive water from the wreckedFukushima nuclearplant intothe ocean. SouthKorea expressed 'strongregret'over the decision.
ttps://www.dw.com/en/fukushima-south-korea-summons-japans-envoy-over-dumping-decision/a-57177353
Japan todump contaminated water fromFukushima nuclearstation intosea
Japan plans to release into theseamore than 1 million tonnes of contaminated water from the destroyedFukushima nuclearstation, the government saidon Tuesday.
ttps://www.france24.com/en/asia-pacific/20210413-japan-to-release-contaminated-water-from-fukushima-nuclear-station-into-sea
Japan'sPrime Minister Suga Yoshihide says a decisionon how to dispose of treated water from theFukushimaDaiichi nuclearpowerplant should not be put off.
ttps://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20210412_18/
irradiated water, Contaminated wastewater
Japanese government saysitWILL release irradiated water fromFukushima nuclearplant into thesea
Contaminated wastewaterat theFukushimaDai-ichi nuclearplantwill be released intothe ocean “in aroundtwo years,” theJapanese governmenthas announced, despite calls fromChina and SouthKorea urging against themove.
ttps://www.rt.com/news/520856-fukushima-contaminated-water-release/
人数の数だけ考え方はあるよ。
みんなで意見を言い合うと
他の人と同じで良いですって、感じになるけど
一人一人カウンセリングしたら、
同じ質問に答えはそれぞれ違っているそう。
おまけ。
男の子って何で出来てる？
男の子って何で出来てる？
男の子って、それらで出来てる。
女の子って何で出来てる？
女の子って何で出来てる？
女の子って、それらで出来てる。
男の人って何で出来てる？
男の人って何で出来てる？
ため息と流し目と嘘の涙
男の人って、それらで出来てる。
女の人って何で出来てる？
女の人って何で出来てる？
女の人って、それらで出来てる。
What arelittleboysmade of,made of?
Frogs and snails
Andpuppy-dog's tails,
That's whatlittleboys aremade of.
What arelittle girlsmade of,made of?
That's whatlittle girls aremade of.
What are young menmade of,made of?
What are young menmade of?
Sighs and leers
And crocodiletears,
That's what young men aremade of.
What are young womenmade of,made of?
What are young womenmade of?
Ribbons and laces
That's what young men aremade of.
OxfordNursery RhymeBook
https://ameblo.jp/fathergoose/entry-11412492413.html
さまより。
マザーグース懐かしすぎる。
The 100Most HandsomeFaces of 2019 -https://t.co/l8yb4vmtOq
--OUTNOW!!!—TC Candler (@tccandler)December 30, 2019
http://anond.hatelabo.jp/20100327202020 のブコメが盛り上がっているのを見て便乗したくなった。
ピアソン・エデュケーション発行『C++プログラミング【第二版】vol.1』asin:489471115X という本のP206～207に、次のような文章がある。
定数変数は名前付き定数もしくは読み出し専用変数と呼ばれることがあります。お気づきのように、「定数変数」という用語は、「小さな大根」や「冷凍焼け」などと同様に形容矛盾です（あなたが気に入っている形容矛盾があったら、まえがきに挙げた筆者らの電子メールアドレスに送ってください。よろしく！）
この本は訳書でオリジナルの英文ではなんと書かれていたかは調べていない。「小さな大根」や「冷凍焼け」は訳者が考えた日本語の形容矛盾だろう。
もっとないか考えてみた。
「裏表紙」…同じ本を読んでいる同僚に話したら「表紙の表というのは表面と内部という対立を表すもので、裏というのは背面と前面という別の対立を表すものだから、矛盾しないのではないか」と熱っぽく反論された。
「若年寄」…筒井康隆の『色眼鏡の狂想曲』（asin:4122025168 所収）という短編で指摘されていた。
「変光恒星」…「変光星」とだけ言うことが多そうだけど、検索したら少しはあったのでコレクションに加える。
「新古車」…これも普通に「未使用車」ということのほうが多いかもしれないが一応。
「新規解約」 …はてなキーワードに項目があるhttp://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/%BF%B7%B5%AC%B2%F2%CC%F3
「黒朱肉」…増田http://anond.hatelabo.jp/20140423112348から仕入れた。検索したら「黒肉〔こくにく〕」というのもあったが通じるのか？
「緑茶」「紅茶」…増田と言えばこんなのもあったhttp://anond.hatelabo.jp/20150717224315
その他、地名がらみでいっぱいあるかもしれない。「西東京市」とか「南北海道」とか。東北地方の南西部を「南西東北」と言ったら一見ではなんのことかわからない。
英語では、「チャーリーとチョコレート工場」の原作の小説に"Squair Candies ThatLooks Round"というのが出てくる。講談社英語文庫版asin:4770028407 だとp131～132だ。
日本語に翻訳不可能なので、英語がわかるやつだけ読んで楽しんでくれ。
"Oh, do shut up," saidMr.Wonka. "Now watch this!" He took akey fromhispocket, andunlocked the door and flungitopen...and suddenly...at the sound of the dooropening,all the rows and rows oflittlesquare candieslooked quickly round to seewhowas coming in. The tinyfaces actually turned toward the door and staredatMr.Wonka.
"Thereyou are!" he cried triumphantly. "They'relooking round! There's no argument aboutit! They aresquare candies thatlook round!"
http://anond.hatelabo.jp/20130514083636
慰安婦問題について個人的な印象を書いたら、それなりに読んでいただけたようだ。読んでくださった方には心から感謝したい。
私の増田に対する反応を見ながら、ついでに橋下の発言に対するTwitter 上の反応を見ていると、「橋下を批判する『左翼』」への反感から、ちょっといかがなものかと思われる議論が散見された。
つまり現実には、危惧したように、「右翼と左翼の党派の議論」にしっかりと落とし込まれてしまっているわけだ。
そこで、慰安婦問題から離れるが、いかがなものかと思われた点をいくつか書き留めておきたい。
本編に入る前に一言だけ、私の増田に対するコメントで気になったものについて反応しておくと、案の定「自称中立」「他人事」等といったご批判を賜った。
もちろん、私にはそういうつもりはなく、むしろその逆で、普段から水商売の女性たちに対する日本の男の視線があまりにもひどいことに憤りを覚えているような人間なので、その延長線であの増田を書いた。したがって、私は喜んで慰安婦の方々や現在の売春婦たちに頭を下げたいと思うものの一人である。（追記 「日本の男の視線」と書いたがこれは誤りで、男女問わず水商売の女性に対する視線がひどいと書くべきであった）
さて、橋下市長の米軍司令官に対する発言と司令官の反応について、米国と日本の文化の差、性倫理の違いやキリスト教の影響を使って理解しようとする向きが少なからずあるように見受けられた。
米軍と売春の関係については、ロイターによる次のような興味深い記事があった。昨年、クリントン国務長官がコロンビアを訪れた際に、シークレットサービスたちが売春婦と遊んだ一件が表沙汰になった話に関する記事だ。事件を覚えておられる方もいるだろう。
U.S. military faces scrutiny over its prostitution policies | Reuters
全部翻訳するわけにはいかないので適当にまとめると、この一件では、シークレットサービスは即刻帰国させられたり処分を受けたりしたそうだが、関与したらしい軍の隊員たちは「門限破り」のためにコロンビアに止め置かれ軍によって調査されたようだ。しかし、どうなっているか情報がなかなか出てこない。上院軍事委員会筆頭理事であるマケイン上院議員が国防総省に「提供された情報が少なすぎる」と言って突っつかなければならなかった。
実は米軍が売春に対して以前よりもきわめて厳格になったのは、2005年、ブッシュ大統領がある大統領令にサインしてからだ。それ以降、売春がたとえ合法の土地であっても売春婦と接触することは許されないものになった。この大統領令によれば、もし違反すれば牢屋送りにもなりかねない。このように厳しい規則になっている理由は、売春は人身売買と深く関係し、あるいは他の犯罪にも絡みかねないという要素が大きいからだ。
（この辺の解説は次のリンクが詳しいか。 Prostitution now punishable under UCMJ）
ところが、ロイターの記事に元将校 Lawrence Korb のコメントがあるが、こんな厳しい大統領令なのに、
牢屋に入った者を見たことがない。共和党上院議員でマケイン議員と同じく上院軍事委員会 の Lindsey Graham も、
he doubts that the military is enforcingits strict prostitution rules.
"The honesttruth is probably no," said Graham, a formerAir Force lawyer.
軍が厳しい規則を順守している点を疑っていると言い、「本当のところはおそらく "no" だろう」と。
つまり、軍としては厳しい規則のもとで売春婦と接触することを禁止しているし教育もしているが、現実の運用に際してはなかなか難しいところで「抜け道」や「黙認」を全否定もできない、というところだろうか。
さて、ここで話を戻すと、橋下市長が沖縄の米軍司令官に「風俗」の活用を提案したところ、司令官が「米軍では禁止の通達を出している。これ以上、この話はやめよう」と言ったのは、こうして見てみるとごく当たり前の話であって、別に文化や倫理観の差によるものでも何でもないことは明白だろう。単純に規則がそうなっているからであり、その規則もとり立ててアメリカ文化やキリスト教の倫理観に依存したものとは思われない。むしろ、世界中で展開している米軍が倫理的に厳格であろうとすることは、非常に理解しやすいところであって、橋下からこんな話をされた司令官は「俺の出世の邪魔をする気か」「こう答える以外に答えようがないじゃねぇか、バカ野郎」くらいのことは思ったのではなかろうか。
また、「現実の話をして何が悪い」と開き直った意見も全くの筋違いであることが理解できるはずだ。そういう問題ではないのである。
米軍の司令官相手に、こんな提案をした橋下が単純に愚劣だとしか言いようがない。
さて第二点として、「売春と日本の『風俗』は違う」という橋下の言い訳を是認する人を何人も見かけた。しかし、少し考えてもらえば、法律上、あるいは表向きはどうあれ、その差にことさらに意味を求めるのはナンセンスであり、現実にはその境目は非常にあいまいだ、ということはすぐ分かると思う。
ピンサロのようなものならまだしも、裸の男女が密着し、「性交以外何でもアリ」で口淫はもちろんのこと、アナルセックスが可能な店まであるうえ、場合によっては性交になる、あるいは女性に直接いくばくか支払えば性交できてしまうことすらある。ソープランドは言うまでもない。
それになにより、軍隊生活を営んでいる屈強な米兵がもしも風俗嬢に性交を強要した場合、どうなるか。橋下や彼に理解を示す人たちには想像力が決定的に欠如していると言わざるを得ない。
さらに、ここでも日本と「欧米」の違いの問題に持ち込もうとする人がいるようだが、もちろんそういう問題では全然ない。
日本の「風俗」は売春と違うという議論は、現実を反映していない単なる詭弁であり、「だからどうした」と言うよりほかない。
第三点に、「まあでも、政治家などが公にこのような『風俗』のことを議論するのはふさわしくないよね」という意見も見かけた。しかしこれは時と場合、あるいは国による。
例えばドイツの例を見てみると、2002年にSPDと緑の党による左派系連立政権が、地位・待遇改善のために、売春婦が労働契約を結べるようにしたそうだ（ただ、結果は以前とあまり変わりはなかったらしい）。また、売春にかかる税があり、行政が徴収しているようでもある。
Prostitution in Germany - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
ドイツの売春宿は、総じて衛生的で、病気に対する警戒心が、日本とは比べ物にならないように思う。日本のヘルスなどの場合、狭い間仕切りに、シャワーなどがあり、常に湿度が高い環境のなかに女の子たちが押し込められていたりすることが少なくない。また、病気への警戒心は個人の意識に大きく依存していて非常に甘いのが現実だと言っていいのではないか。
公衆衛生上の観点から言っても、このような問題は決して「風俗」に行く男や風俗嬢に限った問題ではなく、広く一般の問題でもある。性感染症の拡大はむしろ「風俗」と縁のない男女のほうが深刻な一面もあるやに聞く。
であるならば、現在の風俗営業法を全面的に見直したうえで売春を広く公に認め、衛生管理を充実・徹底させることが急務である。
・・・という意見もあっていいわけであり、もし橋下市長があれだけぶっちゃけるならここまでぶっちゃけるべきであるし、彼に理解を示す人たちも徹底してぶっちゃけるべきだ。
なぜなら、「最古の商売」売春は社会の必要悪であって消失するわけがなく、であるならばちゃんと管理しようという議論にももっともな側面があり、「売春はいけない」と言っていれば済む問題では決してないからだ。
にもかかわらず、なぜか「売春はいけない」という空疎なお題目だけは橋下にしろ彼の理解者たちにしろ揃いも揃って維持されているように、私には見える。
まして、売春だかなんだか分からぬ「風俗」を、合法であるからと言って現状のまま是認し、米軍にお勧めするとは何事か。
まとめると、
１、米軍司令官がああいう反応になったのは、おそらく文化や倫理観の差の問題ではなく、現在の米軍の極めて厳格な規則ゆえであること
２、売春と「風俗」は違うという意見には意味がないだけではなく、その危険性を全く省みていないこと
３、いつものようにぶっちゃける橋下に理解を示すなら、もっと徹底してぶっちゃけて論を展開するべきであること
以上、「橋下に反対する『左翼』」への単なる反感から、橋下に理解を示す人たちについて、気になった点をいくつか書いてみた（念のために繰り返すが、私は自分では中道右派のつもりである）。
お節介ながらこういうことを書いてみたくなったのも、私だって「文化の違い」は大事にしたいものだが、安易に「文化の違い」を持ち出す議論もこれまたいかがなものかと思われたからであり、またあるいは「風俗嬢に対する愛情がないなぁ」とも感じたからだ。
そういうくだらない印象から、「そりゃあ、慰安婦問題だって世論がこれではな」という諦めに似た気持ちにつながりもするのである。
（追記）
これを書いたあとで次の記事をざっと眺めたが、米軍と売春一般や日本の「風俗」との関係について、私の理解はそう大きくずれてないようだと思ったが、いかがだろうか。
Appleon anapplication for a patent for thefuelcellson Thursday are exposed. In the patentapplication,apple describes a kind of electronic equipment, suchas notebook computer usefuelcells, and without any increase in too much weight offuelcell performance optimization method.
Anapplication for a patent for the titleas "forportable computing devicespower supply offuelcell system".Apple says, consumers are becomingmore andmoreattention to use of renewable energy.Fuelcell in technology competitive,as the energy density high, compared with the traditional batteries can be in the same volume providemore energy.
Apple patentapplication show: "fuelcellsand additionalfuel can bring high energy density, in not addingfuel to support ofportable electronic devices fordays or even weeks."Apple also said, use afuelcell is to face the challenge of portability and cost.
Usually, thefuelcells to electronic equipment supportportable charging, and usersneed to carry afuel rods. And this is different, have conceived aand apple electronic equipment tightly integratedfuelcell. And thisone the bulk of the patentapplication in a description of afuelcell stack is used to optimize theflow of energy control system.
Anotherapple patentapplication describes how thefuelcell and rechargeable batteries worktogether, and tomake thefuelcell and rechargeable batteries charging each other. This patentapplication said: "it will be tomake thefuelcell system not necessary to large and heavy integration of thebattery, thus obviously reduce thefuelcell system size, weight and cost."
This is not the firstapplication forapple aboutfuelcell patent. PatentlyAppleweb site said,Octoberthe exposure to a patentapplication shows thatApple are designing afuel panels, fromportable equipment to producemore energy.
Aboutfuelitself,apple a patentapplication shows that there are a variety offuel forpower electronic equipment,one of which is sodium borohydride and water mixture. But these arestillatthe experimental stage,has yet to commercial.
Portablefuelcell chargerfaces amajor obstacle is that manufacturersneed to establish sales channel sales and recycledfuel rods.Apple will likely useapple retail stores to have finished the work.
____________
http://www.chargerbatteryshop.co.uk/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fs62-battery-charger-cbbs.html
http://www.gobatteryonline.com/canon-powershot-a3000-is-battery-charger-gose.html
http://anond.hatelabo.jp/20091123023409
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/%BA%B4%A1%B9%CC%DA%B4%F5
-*米・最も美しい顔100 -米国映画専門サイト「インディペンデント・クリティクス」が主催する「2010年最も美しい顔100(MOST BEAUTIFULFACES 2010)」の33位に選ばれた。日本人として初のランクイン。 --二宮和也（嵐）との熱愛報道（2011年5月） -2010年4月に収録されたＴＢＳ系バラエティー番組「ひみつの嵐ちゃん！」にゲスト出演し、意気投合。昨年冬までに本格交際に発展した。2人は佐々木の自宅でほとんど一緒に暮らしている状態であり、事務所も交際を否定しなかった。 +これまで噂になった人物は、 +-押尾学 - 本人によるコメント無し。事務所も否定しなかった。 +-EXILEのTAKAHIRO - 本人によるコメント無し。事務所も否定しなかった。 +-杉山ハリー - 本人によるコメント無し。事務所も否定しなかった。 +-深田恭子 - 本人によるコメント無し。事務所も否定しなかった。 +-二宮和也（嵐） - 本人によるコメント無し。事務所も否定しなかった。
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keywordlog?klid=1271485
+-西麻生バー店長Y - 本人によるコメント無し。事務所も否定しなかった。
2010年の日本のヒップホップ音楽 【作業用BGM】 ‐ ニコニコ動画(原宿) の曲目。
01.LOST IDENTITY - 道（TAO） (YouTube)
"Lost Identity", 08.15.ILL EAST RECORDS
02.都市伝説 -韻踏合組合 (YouTube)
"都市伝説",10.10.IFK RECORDS
03. 極悪JAZZ feat. 鬼 -キリコ (YouTube)
Produced byDJ OLDFASHION
04. Black File200回記念フリースタイル (Vimeo)
"Black File", 06.24.スペースシャワーTV
05. 夕方 - S.L.A.C.K. (YouTube)
"Swes Swes Cheap", 08.04.Dog Ear Records
06. 思考品M.T.B.D. feat B.D. -DJ Mitsu the Beats (YouTube)
"UNIVERSAL FORCE", 08.04.PLANET GROOVE
07. CAMP'S RULE -RAMB CAMP (YouTube)
Produced byDJ GQ
"RAMB CAMP", 05.14.FILE RECORDS
08. MECCHA MECHA -コッペパン (YouTube)
09. GOOD MORNING BABY -やけのはら (YouTube)
10. 捕食 - asa x CUBEc.u.g.p (YouTube)
"捕食-hoshoku-", 06.11.Jar-BeatRecord
11. イッちゃってイイ? (SUGAR CRACKREMIX) -SD JUNKSTA (YouTube)
12. TORA TORA TORA - TETRAD THEGANG OF FOUR (YouTube)
"SPY GAME",11.12.FILE RECORDS
13. SUNDAYfeat.WAX - PONY (YouTube)
Produced by KURABEATS
"Verseday", 05.05.桃源響RECORDS
14.GetDa Passports - Black Mont Blanc (YouTube)
15.音楽ワルキューレ - DOTAMA (YouTube)
Produced by Fragment
16. いつもそう -WAX fromSD JUNKSTA (YouTube)
Produced by KYN
"神成り", 07.21.諭吉レコード
17.MADE IN JAPAN feat. X-MAN - L-VOKAL (YouTube)
Produced by 1689
"Lovin'", 03.03.MATENRO RECORDS
18. HomewardJourney -Uyama Hiroto (YouTube)
"HomewardJourney",hydeout productions
19. G.H.E.T.T.O -SHINGO☆西成 (YouTube)
Produced by TRAMP
20. STRAIGHTCASH - YING YANG (YouTube)
21.ILLMATIC RACER feat.来門 - UNDER BROS (YouTube)
Produced byTAKE-C
22. トーキョー難民 -あるぱちかぶと (YouTube)
"◎≠", 02.03.Slye Records在音
23.森羅万象 -AXIS (YouTube)
"UNPOPULAR -在日外国人奇声集-", 04.21.Libra Records
24.iPhone forGAGLE -GAGLE (YouTube)
Produced byDJ Mitsu The Beats
exclusive, 07.02. (twitter)
25a.24 BARS TO KILL feat. ANARCHY,RINOLATINA II, 漢, MACCHO -Ski Beatz (YouTube)
"24 HOUR KARATE SCHOOLJAPAN",10.20.R-RATED RECORDS
25b.24 Bars To Kill "IFKREMIX" feat. Hidaddy, Erone, Satussy,遊戯 -Ski Beatz (YouTube)
exclusive,11.05.
25c.24 Bars To Kill "MYCREMIX" feat. RYUZO,DABO,SUIKEN,般若 -Ski Beatz (YouTube)
exclusive,11.06.
26.東京哀歌-トウキョウエレジイ- -空也MC (Youtube)
Produced by fanfan
27.禁断の惑星 feat.志人 - TABOO1 (YouTube)
Produced byDJ KENSEI
"LIFE STYLE MASTA",10.20.Libra Records
28. Break Boy in theDream feat.七尾旅人 -環ROY (YouTube)
"BREAK BOY", 03.17.POPGROUP RECORDINGS
29. DREMSKY - RAUDEF (YouTube)
Produced by PUNPEE
"ESCALATE", 09.10.FILE RECORDS
30.MOTHER feat.MMM,CHIYORI - おみゆきChannel (YouTube)
"おみゆきさん", 03.10.Mary Joy Recordings
31.MISSION POSSIBLE -OLIVE OIL×ILL-BOSSTINO×B.I.G.JOE (YouTube)
"MISSION POSSIBLE", 07.21.OILWORKSTHA BLUE HERB RECORDINGSTRIUMPH RECORDS
32. WAKE UP feat.MARIA - QN from SIMI LAB (Amebreak)
"THE SHELL", 07.29.FILE RECORDS
